University of California, Irvine
CRITO: Center for Research on Information Technology & Organizations
 

Research

News & Events
About CRITO

Site Map
Home


search CRITO

 

 

 

   

Research Spotlight

Which Telework? Defining and testing a taxonomy of technology-mediated work at a distance

An article by CRITO Associates Kelly Garrett and James Danziger, titled “Which Telework? Defining and Testing a Taxonomy of Technology-Mediated Work at a Distance” is forthcoming in the Social Science Computer Review. Telework has been the subject of study for three decades, and scholars have defined it in many different ways during that time. This article aims to clarify the meaning of telework by presenting a taxonomy that distinguishes between three distinct forms: fixed-site telework, mobile telework and flexiwork. The authors use data collected in a national survey of more than 1,200 US computer-using workers to demonstrate that the three types of teleworkers are unique along key dimensions regarding their individual characteristics, organizational and technological contexts and the impacts on their work.

The authors define Fixed-site teleworkers as those whose remote work occurs in the home. These workers must work in the home or split their time between the home and the office, spending more than 90% of their time working in these two locations. Mobile teleworkers are defined as those who spend more than 90% of their time in the field or split between the field and an office. Flexiworkers are teleworkers who spent at least 10% of their work time in each of three locations: the office, the home and the field.

Based on their findings, Garrett and Danziger offer the following generalizations regarding the three types of teleworkers:

Fixed-site teleworkers, whose ICT-supported remote work is primarily at home, constitute about 11% of all computer-using workers. Fixed-site teleworkers seem to be work-pressured professionals employed in technologically sophisticated organizations. Members of this group express relatively high job autonomy. They are the group least likely to express concern about computerized work monitoring. At the same time, fixed-site teleworkers also experience more work-related stress than either flexiworkers or mobile teleworkers: almost three in five report having trouble keeping up with their workload. The fact that fixed-site teleworkers, like other types of teleworkers, work longer hours than office workers could be both a cause and a consequence of technology. For some fixed-site teleworkers, having home access to work resources might enable them to do more of their existing after-hours work in the home. That is, longer hours might make telework more likely. For others, the flexibility afforded by telework might increase their sense of obligation to the employer. For this group, longer hours are a consequence of teleworking.

Mobile teleworking constitute 9% of computer-using workers and represent a different approach to telework, emphasizing use of ICTs in field locations. The use of the technology by this group appears less likely to be viewed as a discretionary privilege. It is deployed more broadly among workers and is met with more suspicion. They represent a wider range of occupations. Mobile teleworkers are more likely than other teleworkers to view computers as a tool for monitoring their work, and they are twice as likely as other teleworkers to report low job influence. On the positive side, mobile teleworkers are also far less likely to report difficulty in keeping up with their workload compared to the other groups.

Flexiworkers constitute about 5% of all computer-using workers, are the teleworkers who tend to use ICTs to support work in both the home and the field. While they come from a variety of occupations, among all teleworkers they include the largest proportion in sales, closely followed by management/business/financial occupations. They report the highest level of influence over their job of any type of teleworker. They are arguably the closest to the current conception of the “anytime/anyplace” technology-enabled worker. They are twice as likely of either of the other teleworker types to describe their organization as technically unsophisticated, suggesting that they have the highest expectations about how ICTs can support their work and that they might take more initiative in adopting and shaping their use of these technologies.

Other interesting findings include:

  • Regarding total work time, teleworkers, who average close to 50 hours a week, work longer hours than office workers, who average less than 45 hours.
  • A slight majority (53%) of fixed-site teleworkers are female, while a slight majority of flexiworkers are male (55%). More than 75% of current mobile flexiworkers are male.
  • More than three-fourths of all types of teleworkers have remote access to organizational data, and surprisingly, one in four teleworkers does NOT have remote access to such data.
  • Overall, job satisfaction is very high among all groups of teleworkers.

Both the remarkable advances in remote information and communications technologies and the extent to which organizations and workers are integrating these ICTs seem central to the emerging world of anytime/anyplace telework. The researchers believe that telework is an important concept, and that the use of ICT capabilities away from the office will become more widespread and more significant.
.

(CRITO Research Spotlight, December 2006)

 

read past
Spotlights

 

 

 

 

Center for Research on Information Technology & OrganizationsUC Irvine

top of page