What explains why organizations
adopt computing technologies? This is the fundamental
question addressed in Computerization Movements
and the Diffusion of Technological Innovations,
the new book by Margaret S. Elliott
and Kenneth L. Kraemer.
The
management and organizational research on diffusion
of technical innovations has tended to emphasize
features of technology, organization, and environment
that shape diffusion in response to an economic
need. Environment has been conceived narrowly
as constituting pressure for adoption due to
firm, industry, or global competition. But several
computer scientists have argued that environment
needs to be conceived as a richer construct
that captures more of the dynamics of diffusion
within society. That is, diffusion takes place
in a broad context of interacting organizations
and institutions which shape visions of what
the technology can do and how it should be used.
Those socially constructed visions of the technology
shape the perceptions of people in organizations
and drive diffusion.
Innovation diffusion theory emphasizes the
importance of the relationship between the features
of technological innovations and the context
of adopting organizations or societal groups
in achieving diffusion of technology such as
computers or information communication technologies
(ICTs). Diffusion occurs when the innovation
has reached a stage where organizations or society
have adopted an innovation in practice. Sociologists
and economists have theorized that diffusion
in organizations is influenced by the specific
context of the adopting organizations and by
specific features of the technology or technological
process being adopted. Examples of context might
include organization size, adoption costs, technical
background of potential users, or similar features.
Various aspects of a technology, such as competitive
advantage, return on investment, usability of
the technology, or fit with work practices,
might intervene in the diffusion process.
Although innovation diffusion theory is helpful
in understanding the adoption and use of specific
technologies in organizations, it does not address
the broader societal context that influences
technological diffusion, such as ideological
beliefs or visions surrounding an innovation.
Many groups within society, such as vendors,
media, academics, visionaries, and professional
societies, are instrumental in promoting the
adoption and diffusion of technology through
utopian visions of what the technology can do
to change or improve social or work life. Kling
and Iacono have called this broad environmental
dynamic a “computerization movement” (CM) to
signal its separation from, yet affiliation
with, technology and social movements more generally.
Through theoretical analyses, systematic empirical
studies, field-based studies, and case studies
of specific technologies, the book shows CMs
to be driven by Utopian visions of technology
that become part of the ether within society,
creating a general bias in favor of computing
adoption. The empirical studies presented here
show the need for designers, users, and the
media to be aware that CM rhetoric can propose
grand visions that never become part of a reality,
and reinforce the need for critical and scholarly
review of promising new technologies.
|
|