Appendix A:  Supplementary Tables

 

Table A-1: Distribution of All Teachers Reporting Activity

by Subject Taught (Percent)

 

Monthly Reflective Essays

Weekly Reflective Essays

 

Monthly Journal Entries

 

Weekly Journal Entries

 

Subject Taught

Middle Grades

High School

Middle Grades

High School

Middle Grades

High School

Middle Grades

High School

English

34

31

43

38

37

45

41

54

Social studies

19

18

14

17

10

10

10

7

Science

15

22

11

23

15

9

14

11

Math

12

7

13

6

14

9

10

4

Foreign Language

2

5

1

3

4

5

2

5

Computers

4

1

4

0

3

2

3

2

Business Ed.

1

4

0

1

0

2

0

3

Vocational

1

3

2

3

2

8

2

7

Fine Arts

1

2

0

1

1

1

2

1

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Sample: Probability sample.

 

 

Table A-2: Subjects where Reflective Writing is more Common in Middle School

 

Percent Reporting Monthly Writing by Students

 

Subject & Level*

 

Write in Journal

Essay explaining

thoughts in length

Essay or discussion seriously assessing own work

Science (MS)

34

44

24

Science (HS)

9

51

19

Math (MS)

23

26

14

Math (HS)

11

21

6

Computer (MS)

24

47

31

Computer (HS)

9

13

12

Sample: Probability sample.

*MS = middle school, HS =  high school.

 

Table A-3: Reasons for Questioning Students

­(Percent Asking Question for the following purposes very often or always)

 

 

Subject and  Level*

 

Ask for the correct answer

 

Check if students did homework

Have students justify or explain their reasoning

Elicit student ideas and opinion

Have students relate work to their own experience

English (MS)

52

29

74

75

70

English (HS)

29

25

78

86

65

Social Studies (MS)

53

28

66

57

49

Social Studies (HS)

52

37

76

76

62

Science (MS)

48

27

60

80

57

Science (HS)

48

31

63

75

51

Math (MS)

69

39

55

93

47

Math (HS)

63

40

56

80

26

Sample: Probability sample.

*MS = middle school, HS =  high school.

 

 

 

Table A-4: Correlations among elements of cognitive challenge and

 among elements of active learning strategies, by teacher subject and level

 

Correlation Among Elements of Cognitive Challenge

 

Correlation Among Elements of
Active Learning Strategies

 

 

Reflective Writing & Deep Thinking

Meaningful Thinking & Problem-Solving

 

 

Projects & Group Work

Projects & Infrequent Traditional Practices

Groups & Infrequent Traditional Practices

 

Mean Correlation in Row

English (MS)

.46

.64

.54

.48

.36

.49

English (HS)

.49

.67

.37

.52

.21

.45

Social Studies (MS)

.55

.69

.54

.48

.50

.55

Social Studies (HS)

.55

.72

.35

.36

.16

.43

Science (MS)

.52

.65

.41

.46

.15

.44

Science (HS)

.49

.58

.43

.36

.10

.39

Math (MS)

.49

.63

.45

.50

.32

.48

Math (HS)

.49

.65

.28

.50

–.01

.38

Foreign Language (All)

.39

.46

.30

.33

.11

.32

Computer (All)

.47

.49

.22

.28

.02

.30

Business (All)

.40

.60

.01

.43

.02

.29

Vocational (All)

.47

.45

.51

– .05

– .35

.20

Fine Arts (All)

.58

.72

.28

.20

– .10

.34

Elementary Self-contained

.55

.62

.52

.49

.23

.48

Elementary Other

.62

.57

.46

.52

.23

.48

Mean correlation in column

.50

.61

.38

.39

.13

.40

Sample: Probability and purposive samples.

 

Table A-5: Percent of Teachers That Have Students Work in Groups To Come Up
 With A Joint Solution Or To Approach a Problem or Task Weekly or More Often

 

Elementary

Middle School

High School

All Teachers

Elementary Self-Contained

59

 

 

59

Elementary Other

49

 

 

49

English

 

32

37

34

Social Studies

 

29

38

33

Science

 

48

37

42

Math

 

59

45

52

Foreign Language

 

45

34

39

Computers

 

38

30

34

Business

 

26

24

25

Vocational

 

43

54

50

Fine Arts

 

22

20

21

All Teachers

56

42

38

44

Sample: Probability sample.

 

 


Table A-6: Correlations between cognitive challenge and active
 learning strategies, by teacher subject and level

 

 

 

Cognitive Challenge & Projects

 

 

Cognitive Challenge & Group Work

Cognitive Challenge & Infrequent Traditional Practices

 

Cognitive Challenge & Active Learning

 

 

Mean Correlation in Row

English (MS)

.56

.56

.39

.62

.53

English (HS)

.52

.48

.32

.58

.48

Social Studies (MS)

.48

.54

.29

.55

.46

Social Studies (HS)

.38

.58

.21

.55

.43

Science (MS)

.55

.56

.17

.60

.47

Science (HS)

.54

.57

.14

.60

.46

Math (MS)

.50

.56

.21

.59

.46

Math (HS)

.34

.46

.07

.42

.32

Foreign Language (All)

.40

.23

.32

.43

.34

Computer (All)

.38

.56

– .07

.52

.35

Business (All)

.01

.69

– .31

.35

.19

Vocational (All)

.49

.41

.11

.57

.39

Fine Arts (All)

.36

.52

.04

.53

.36

Elementary Self-contained

.64

.64

.29

.70

.57

Elementary Other

.43

.57

.12

.49

.40

Mean Correlation in Column

.44

.53

.15

.54

.41

Sample: Probability and purposive samples.

 

 

Table A-7:  Percent of secondary teachers undertaking projects,

and overall distributions of those projects across secondary subjects

 

% of secondary teachers undertaking week long projects, monthly

Distribution of weeklong projects, by secondary subjects

(pie chart view)

 

 

% of secondary teachers reporting hands on-lab activities monthly

Distribution of hands-on/lab activities, by secondary subject

(pie chart view)

Distribution of teachers by subject in the top 50%  overall on projects (pie chart view)

English

62

26

51

14

17

Social Studies

44

13

52

10

14

Science

39

16

92

25

20

Math

11

5

53

15

16

Foreign Lang.

27

3

52

4

5

Computers

73

7

99

6

4

Business

59

5

84

5

3

Vocational

67

7

90

6

5

Fine Arts

92

8

91

5

5

All Teachers

45

100

68

100

100

Sample: Probability sample.

 

 


Table a-8:  MEAN Z-SCORES ON CONSTRUCTIVIST PRACTICE IN SELECTED CLASS,

BY SUBJECT AND LEVEL

 

Constructivist Practice

 

Cognitive Challenge

 

Active Learning

 

 

 

 

 

Meaningful Thinking

 

 

Problem-Solving

 

(Cognitive Challenge Index)

 

 

 

Group Work

 

 

 

Projects

 

Infrequent traditional practices

 

(Active Learning Index)

 

(Constr-uctivist Practice Index)

English (MS)

0.45

– 0.27

0.27

 

– 0.11

– 0.14

0.19

– 0.09

 

0.16

English (HS)

0.68

– 0.01

0.53

 

0.17

–0.06

0.68

0.25

 

0.49

Social Studies (MS)

– 0.16

– 0.51

– 0.29

 

– 0.24

– 0.23

0.11

– 0.25

 

– 0.29

Social Studies (HS)

0.19

– 0.17

0.09

 

0.02

– 0.34

0.06

– 0.21

 

– 0.01

Science (MS)

– 0.03

0.14

– 0.01

 

0.26

0.09

0.24

0.22

 

0.10

Science (HS)

– 0.27

– 0.09

– 0.25

 

– 0.09

– 0.14

0.09

– 0.12

 

– 0.21

Math (MS)

– 0.32

0.33

– 0.17

 

0.02

– 0.68

– 0.55

– 0.64

 

– 0.38

Math (HS)

– 0.66

0.03

– 0.54

 

– 0.05

– 0.92

– 0.7

– 0.86

 

– 0.73

Foreign Language (All)

– 0.27

– 0.58

– 0.44

 

– 0.19

– 0.21

– 0.58

– 0.50

 

– 0.51

Computer (All)

– 0.50

0.02

– 0.36

 

– 0.29

0.97

0.31

0.56

 

0.02

Business (All)

– 0.71

– 0.78

– 0.82

 

– 0.76

0.30

– 0.26

– 0.22

 

– 0.64

Vocational (All)

– 0.26

0.27

– 0.14

 

0.15

1.11

0.32

0.80

 

0.27

Fine Arts (All)

– 0.66

– 0.32

– 0.6

 

– 0.55

1.33

0.66

0.87

 

– 0.02

Elem. Self-Contained

0.45

0.31

0.42

 

0.18

0.24

– 0.12

– 0.02

 

0.36

Elementary Other

0.12

0.13

0.13

 

0.12

–0.01

– 0.08

0.12

 

0.09

Sample:  Probability sample.

*MS = middle school, HS = high school.